Can I get someone else's criminal convictions history without their knowledge?

In short, no.

If you want to find out about someone’s criminal record, one way is to use the Check Please service, which automates the process and can give you the result in as little as 3 working days.

However while Check Please automates the process (and allows for requests to be processed much faster than the manual process provided by the Ministry of Justice), it still relies on the Individual's consent.

As such, apart from some fringe situations under the Official Information Act (OIA), you cannot obtain someone else's criminal convictions history (criminal record) without their knowledge and consent.

Another exception is a new scheme that has been introduced by the Police specifically for people to find out if their partner or a family member's partner has a history of violence. The aim is to enable a partner of a previously violent individual to make informed choices about whether and how they continue the relationship.

Further information about the scheme, including details of how to make a request, can be found on the Police’s website.

Popular posts from this blog

From today you can get your own criminal record from the Ministry of Justice in 3 days - free, fast and online

Image
  It's been a long time coming, but the Ministry of Justice has finally moved online today for anyone wanting their own criminal record. The bad old days of printing out and signing and then scanning paper forms, and then waiting for 20 business days or more are over. Now you can get your own criminal record directly from the Ministry of Justice . It's fast (3 working days) and it's free. We were keen to try out the new process, and see how it works, so here goes. It's fast and it's free - but it's of limited use. These are the big points. You can get your own criminal record in 3 days instead of 20, and you don't need to pay a thing. The downside is that the result is of limited use to you, because the result is not cryptographically signed, and there is no secure way for you to share it. It's all very well checking out your own criminal record, but instead it's often a potential employer like an Uber who wants to see your record. Of course you can
Read more

The complete history of New Zealand's Clean Slate Act

The Ministry of Justice's Criminal Records Unit processes about 450,000 requests a year from New Zealanders wanting to see their records, often to provide them to a potential employer. New Zealand's Criminal Records (Clean Slate) Act 2004 was designed to allow people with less serious offenses and who have not re-offended within seven years to put the past behind them. Rather than simply being "soft on crime" as some opponents claimed at the time the Act was passed, the seven-year qualifying period was based on statistical evidence that showed people with minor convictions who had not re-offended after seven years were no more likely to re-offend than those without convictions. No one doubted that the Act would have a significant impact in concealing past convictions, and it did. Information released by the Ministry of Justice showed that 115,508 people who requested a copy of their criminal history between November 2004 and June 2014 were told they "ha
Read more

3 legal traps for NZ employers dealing with criminal record checks

Image
When it comes to candidate criminal record checks, you're dealing with the ultimate in sensitive personal data, so your recruitment process has to be squeaky clean. Here are 3 areas to watch out for. 1. If you're hiring people conditionally, keep all of your paperwork straight - not just your application form In 2013, Fonterra was forced to pay $18,000 compensation to Jason Richardson, a driver who was sacked after he failed to disclose his traffic and criminal convictions on Fonterra's job application form. Fonterra's application form at the time was crystal clear regarding convictions. It asked applicants to disclose any criminal or driving convictions. It also dealt with cases where background check results were not confirmed until after employment had started, by stating that misleading or false information could be grounds for dismissal without notice. However when applying, Richardson mistakenly assumed that his previous convictions fell under the Cle
Read more